“Jhinuk, meetings should always be planned at least when it is with the head of the organization,” is what the people’s director at our organization told me today morning in response to the supposedly sudden meeting I fixed between the 3 of us – him, me and the India head of our organization.
We have been talking about some employer branding activities through participation in industry surveys. This has been on for a while. And today one of those industry surveys begins. We needed to discuss some bit of it with the country head. Both me and the people’s director agreed that we need to meet the chief today. But his reaction my execution of the meeting thought and his subsequent behavior in the meeting, somehow surprised me, rather intrigued me. Every second statement between the two biggies took the defensive guise. It felt like as though I was watching a tennis match with the ball popping from left to right.
And this isn’t a unique case. This is one of the many events i have been witnessing ever since I started working. I have seen an individual contributor (IC) speaks more confidently and honestly with his/her boss than a manager. Why? Is it because an IC is clearer about his/her responsibilities and therefore where he/she stands vis-à-vis that than a manager for whom the role has been getting more ambiguous and unpredictable as he rises up and therefore cluelesness as to where he/she stands vis-à-vis what’s expected out of him? Or, is it the fat salary packages that we get? For instance I and I know many of my friends were much more concerned about the work we are doing than the salary we were drawing. Today most of my well earning friends only worry about how to save the monthly lakh that get credited into their account. And me, surprisingly, my attention is divided into a 50:50 ratio. Salary and the content of work surprisingly hold the equal amount of weight-age for me. Surprisingly because, it is the same me who a year back had left a cushiony corporate job to go back to a journalism job that didn’t even pay half of what the corporate one did. And all these, because I did not like what I am doing. Today I am back to the same corporate job and I do get jittery at the thought of that much money (quite a bit by my standard – for an average IT guy it could be peanut:) not being credited to my account. of course thankful, at least until today I still put in my thinking into my job and try to make it more interesting. but I do not know how long would that continue.
I have seen people tilting only towards money as their salary gets heavier than their work. I do not know if it’s unique to India or is it everywhere. For instance, if i miss a meeting for some reason I make no bones about apologizing and giving out the ‘real’ story, but I have seen my seniors either sliding the miss under the table or when caught becoming defensive if it’s the boss and or offensive and even retributive if it’s a junior.
Why? Is it because the power gets into your head? Or, is it because you feel more powerless with the fear of losing the power and money you have. I do not know. I am really really surprised to see the kind of show senior people put up to project they are busy and that they are doing their work. I mean of course that’s why you are where you are. Many a times when I would ask for responses from managers through emails, they would not respond or say the ‘this week is tight’. And in many cases when I land up at their work station I spot them playing cards, or games or on some social networking site at times or even at job portals. In meetings you argue not because you do not agree about a matter or because your are ‘thinking’ otherwise, fact is you might not be even ‘thinking’ about it, but you still argue to snub the other person’s statement lest others think you are dumb and he isn’t. Senior management meetings are like a snakes and ladder game!!
But quite oddly, most of the attrition at these senior management level aren’t because the companies have asked them out, or some other companies have voluntarily offered them but because they leave themselves. Given the kind of insecurities they have about losing what they have, I wonder why would they leave those themselves (so what if they are getting opportunities elsewhere, why leave this one in the first place and go through the hell of looking for another job, when you have a cushiony one already at hand)?
At this point I would imagine it could an insecurity within self. may be we think we aren’t good enough vis-a-vis what we are getting and as we rise that vacuum keeps growing, so we decide to quit before anyone finds out we aren’t good enough. Problem is there isn’t any fault within us. Actually rising up the ladder is all about getting more ambiguous about what you are doing, and that’s why getting more adaptive to any situation. Every time you get promoted your work gets more ambiguous handling which is the toughest job and that’s what the company pays those managers for – handling the unknown.